Developer Forums | About Us | Site Map


Useful Lists

Web Host
site hosted by netplex

Online Manuals

XML-RPC as object model
By David Mertz, Ph.D. - 2003-12-11 Page:  1 2 3 4 5 6

Weaknesses of xml_pickle

Unfortunately, xml_pickle lacks some types that many programming languages have. If our goal is not simply to save and restore Python objects, but to exchange objects across languages, then xml_pickle is not currently quite adequate. The issue of floats and integers is not really important in principle; but designing an "unpickler" for, say, Java would be easier if the XML parser were able to determine the type needed, rather than defer that until the format of the value attribute is analyzed.

Of more serious concern for cross-language pickling are the <boolean> and <dateTime.iso8601> tags that XML-RPC has, but Python lacks as a built-in type. Even though I claimed that xml_pickle handled user classes that define custom data types easily and well, this is not quite as true when it comes to the cross-language case. For example, the fragment of an xml_pickle representation in Listing 6 describes an iso8601 Date/Time:

Listing 6. xml_pickle version of an iso8601 Date/Time
<attr name="dte" type="PyObject" class="DateTime" id="1984076">
  <attr name="value" type="string" value="20011122T17:28:55" />

Two issues make it difficult to utilize this data in, say, Perl or REBOL or PHP. One is the namespace of the restored class. In Python, the namespace of the restored xmlrpclib.DateTime becomes, by default, xml_pickle.DateTime (but the namespaces can be manually manipulated prior to unpickling). The way Python's instantiation and namespaces work, little rests on this fact, at least not if we're interested in the instance attributes rather than its methods. But various languages handle scoping matters in very different ways.

The second and far more important issue is the fact that this custom class cannot be easily recognized as a native type in languages where it is one. Perl and PHP do not have a native DateTime type anyway, so nothing is really lost as long as unpicklers in those languages restore the value instance attribute. REBOL, by contrast, has many more native data types -- not just dates, but also exotic types like e-mail addresses and URLs. These are lost in the xml_pickle process. Of course, XML-RPC also loses those data types. Either way, we are left with plain string type to represent something more specific (or <base64> in XML-RPC, which xml_pickle handles by escaping high bit values -- for example, "\xff").

View XML-RPC as object model Discussion

Page:  1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page: Conclusion: Where to go from here

First published by IBM developerWorks

Copyright 2004-2017 All rights reserved.
Article copyright and all rights retained by the author.